JobDismantler-Assemblejob
Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:37 pm
Hi,
I try to make a flow than clean temporary mac's files.
I put inside a folder or structure folders inside files.
Like this example
folder1:
.ds_store (temporary mac's file)
._dile.indd (temporary mac's file)
file.indd,
file2.indd
folder2:
file3.pdf
file4.xls
I want to get up this result:
folder1:
file.zip (file.indd and file2.indd)
folder2.zip (this if is posible else together in one file)
First I use job dismantler:
-Subfolder: 99
-Attach hierarchy info: yes
-Add job folder name: yes
-Include subfolder level: 1
-Save top subfolders: yes
and in assemble job put:
-Scheme: ungroup job
-Private data key: ungroup
-Numbers of file: automatic
-Merge data: yes
-Job Folder name: single line...[Job.Hierarchy:Index=1]
-Strip unique name: yes
My problem is that when assemble job give me all file without the folder1, delete the temporary files.
I don´t know what i make bad. Could you help me please? or if you have other posibility to keep off temporary mac´s files, perhaps it´s valid for me.
Thanks, best regards.
Miguel
I try to make a flow than clean temporary mac's files.
I put inside a folder or structure folders inside files.
Like this example
folder1:
.ds_store (temporary mac's file)
._dile.indd (temporary mac's file)
file.indd,
file2.indd
folder2:
file3.pdf
file4.xls
I want to get up this result:
folder1:
file.zip (file.indd and file2.indd)
folder2.zip (this if is posible else together in one file)
First I use job dismantler:
-Subfolder: 99
-Attach hierarchy info: yes
-Add job folder name: yes
-Include subfolder level: 1
-Save top subfolders: yes
and in assemble job put:
-Scheme: ungroup job
-Private data key: ungroup
-Numbers of file: automatic
-Merge data: yes
-Job Folder name: single line...[Job.Hierarchy:Index=1]
-Strip unique name: yes
My problem is that when assemble job give me all file without the folder1, delete the temporary files.
I don´t know what i make bad. Could you help me please? or if you have other posibility to keep off temporary mac´s files, perhaps it´s valid for me.
Thanks, best regards.
Miguel